jnriran.blogg.se

Golden v. state farm insurance
Golden v. state farm insurance












golden v. state farm insurance golden v. state farm insurance golden v. state farm insurance

¶ 28.) Following a bench trial, judgment was entered against plaintiff. ¶¶ 26, 29.) Plaintiff admits that the staff counsel appropriately advised her of his status as an employee of defendant. ¶ 26.) Defendant's staff counsel entered an appearance in the lawsuit as counsel for plaintiff, and defended plaintiff in the suit. In October of 2009, a lawsuit was filed against plaintiff following an auto accident involving plaintiff. defend an insured in any claim or lawsuit, with attorneys chosen by us." ( Id., emphasis in original.) (DE #1 ¶ 4.) In the policy, defendant promised to pay "attorneys fees for attorneys chosen by us to defend an insured who is sued for such damages." (DE #11-1 at 10 Policy at 6, emphasis in original.) The policy also stated that defendant had "the right to. Plaintiff asserts that some time before April 24, 2009, she purchased an auto insurance policy from defendant.














Golden v. state farm insurance